Starbucks into the China market

Starbucks has established an internationalization approach to allow the corporation to franchises and internationally open stores (Alon and Bian 2005). The market study is at the center of several of the marketplace entry approaches Starbucks is using. The literature will contemplate how market exploration has supported entry of Starbucks into the markets in China (Venkatraman, and Nelson 2008).

Starbucks Intercontinental Business Policy

Entry of Starbucks into developing and emerging bazaars is informed by market exploration. Starbucks carried out the market inquiry to facilitate more profound understanding of markets in Chinese (Alon and Bian 2005), as well as the means that Capitalism functions in the Republic of China. China comprises of several discrete provincially-based marketplaces, an element that makes market study vital to launching contemporary franchises and stores in China. A profound appreciative of laws of intellectual property dangerous to valid market entry in evolving markets (Venkatraman, and Nelson 2008).

 

Starbucks voiced an entry approach which would address the major markets in China, and that was planned to be as innocuous on the culture of China as imaginable (Han and Zhang 2009). Rather than taking conservative strategy with promotions and advertising that could have been observed by potential Chinese customers as confronting their philosophy of sipping tea; they situated supplies in high-traffic also in high perceptibility locations (Alon 2006). Besides, Starbucks very intentionally started to connect the gap between the culture of drinking tea as well as the philosophy of drinking coffee by announcing drinks in the stores in China which comprised regional tea-based components (Hwang 2005).

Market exploration reinforced the growth of aggressive internationalization approach of China (Zakaria et al., 2005). The all-embracing ambitious plan was to create a self-improving brand. Forthcoming Starbucks clients in China could hope for what Starbucks denotes to as the 3rd involvement (Harrison et al. 2005). The Starbucks experience carriers’ status which is highly attractive to those wishful to Western values or to ascending the pecking order a personal philosophy (Harrison et al. 2005).

Market examination specifies that consistency of the product is significant to the customers of the Starbucks. When Starbucks opened an innovative supply in a new marketplace like China, the finest baristas are directed for the promotion besides to conducting baristas’ training who will continue as soon as the inauguration is completed (Han and Zhang 2009).

Market Investigation Addresses the Emergent Souk Political Situation

Market investigation help to recognize the characteristics of capitalism in the PRC; Peoples’ Republic of China. The standard class in China has speedily assumed Western values as a satisfactory principle of the middle-class. Besides, Chinese clients consent to acquisitions of extravagance goods as the way of trailing quality way of life. Under the communism influence, the Chinese deliberated conspicuous consumption to be indicative or decadent of lack of patriotic orientation. Capitalism in the PRC supports the cognizant population which marked its interests in keeping pace with Jones’ via extreme indulgence consumption. The support of luxury consumption by Chinese administration is explicitly visible in particular metropolises in China. The 2nd Chengdu city serves as a market investigation study in Chinese administrative capitalism support (Harrison et al. 2005).

Chengdu stimulates capitalism at a level supported by the existence of supplies such as Cartier and Vuitton in its inner city. According to Chengdu Marketing Industry Connotation, supplies selling eighty percent of intercontinental indulgence brands are situated in Chengdu, besides the metropolis ranks merely 1/3 in amenity transactions after Shanghai and Beijing. It is effortless to observe how this countrywide positioning toward extravagance goods encompasses to the brands of the brand that is categorized by a particular extent of exclusiveness (Chaudhry, Zimmerman, Peters, and Cordell, 2009).

Market Inquiry Discloses Qualities of Evolving Souk Legal Setting

It is indispensable to comprehend intellectual property rights rules also permitting problems when arranging market entry in an evolving marketplace. Starbucks has applied the laws of copyright to avert its model of business along with brands from being unlawfully copied by Chinese. Four centuries after inaugural of its first coffee bar in China in 1999, Starbucks had itemized each of its first trademark in China. Many Chinese companies have exceeded permissible pledges in their attempts to copy the prosperous model of Starbucks. The organization along with the arrangement of global operation of Starbucks was well-versed by a market study. The organizational plans that Starbucks employed were derived from the experiences of Starbucks in other evolving marketplaces supported a primary appreciation that China is not one similar souk (Hwang 2005).

The strategies of the organization that Starbucks employed addressed diverse markets in China. The dominant culture in Northern China radically differs from the philosophy within the China’s eastern parts, as shown in the diversities in the power of consumer spending inland that is significantly lower than the power of expenditures in the coastal metropolis. The intricacy of Chinese marketplace led to local companies to assist in the plans of Starbucks for development in China; the conglomerates provided clients understanding of tastes along with preferences of Chinese which helped Starbucks confine to the various markets.

• Northern China – combined project with Beijing Mei Da Coffee Corporation
• Eastern China – aligned with Taiwan-based Uni-President
• Southern China – operated with Caterers of Maxim in Hong Kong

The competitive edge of Starbucks is created on products, services along with brand characteristics, several of which have been made known via market study to be significant to clients of Starbucks (Plog 2005). Western products have advantages over local Chinese goods because of a usually established character for steadily higher excellent product and service, an element that set the Western product as quality brands in the mind of the client.  When Western products try increasing market shares by reduction of prices, they wear away the actual competitive plan which provides them with advantage perception of consumers. Besides, Western products cannot successfully upkeep lower price strategies than regional brands in China. Sustain the integrity of brand in innovative markets. The global brand of Starbuck is useful as well as maintaining the integrity if the brand is an essential focus on internationalization efforts of Starbucks (Hwang 2005). The Chinese baristas acted as ambassadors of the brand to assist implant the culture of Starbucks in the innovative marketplace as well as confirming that high values for client service along with brand quality are preserved at every contemporary and also the recognized local stores. The ability of the Starbucks to address varying bazaars is polished by operative along continuing market study. Launching as well as upholding an international Starbucks products does not imply having an international platform or unvarying intercontinental brands. The marketing strategy of Starbucks in China was founded on customization to reaction to different Chinese client target division. Starbucks created a wide-ranging client taste outline examination which is satisfactorily swift to allow them to vary with the soul as well as to develop East Encounters West product combination (Alon, and Bian, 2005). Besides, the regionalization effort is adequately supple to allow all stores to have the tractability from an extensive drink portfolio (Alon 2006).

Reason for the success of Starbucks than competitor

Gripping morning joes along with afternoon pick-up are significant parts of the era for thousands of persons globally, providing excuses of stepping outside, take short walks and revitalize. How diverse one would the 21st Century lives be if there no coffee to energize and buzz us? To lovers of coffee, this theoretical assumption might be a scary one (Berry 2000).

The wish-even require-for coffee is what attracts the masses as well as make coffee such an enormous trade. In nearly all civilized places nowadays, a coffee cup is never too far-off also in urban settings, it is hard walking four minutes without seeing a seller. Starbucks has obtained its fair backlash share at the beginning of current inequalities for anticipated ¾ revenues. When it appeared that the corporation is still expanding, however, that incomes per share are two cents less than the anticipated for the period, stocks fell by 10.99% on 27th July after the business. However, this life-threatening response to the shortfall of Starbucks might merely be a thrilling overreaction. All public companies will unavoidably have its downs and ups. Therefore the large picture is significant to bear in mind (Noe, R.A., Hollenbeck, Gerhart, and Wright, 2006). Over the last centuries, the trend of Starbucks is one of development, in spite of a few shrill recessions-this current one being the sharpest. According to Agustino Fontevecchia, the Forbes Markets Reporter, excessive hopefulness about the expansion of Starbucks in China set stakeholder up for dissatisfaction (Berry 2000). The economy of the world indicated that it could not handle as much as savers predicted in shares across the boards this period, hence the reduced rate of expansion is not particular to Starbucks. Still, the Chief Executive Officer Howard Shultz contended that the corporation would endure being a capital on both international and national scales, drawing attention to that was its 11th successive record result quarter (Porter 2008).

It is no doubt that last Friday marked low points for Starbucks. However, its forty-one centuries of the determination made it attractively Solid Corporation in the outstanding project of coffee sellers (Vogel, D., 2007). The coffee lead launched its primary stockpile in Pike Place Market in Seattle in 1971. However, supplies did not begin to multiply in relevant statistics until late 1990. An essential company point (Frei 2006), Howard Shultz publicly took Starbucks in 1992. From 1990 to 2000, the permit went from possessing eighty-four locations to 3,500. It was an important year; however, nothing brilliant compared to the supplementary thirteen thousand five hundred stockpiles which have opened as from the year 2000. Let us discuss the factors for the success of the Starbucks other than its superiority which continued to draw loyal consumers (Porter 2008).

A Domicile for Everybody

Several people would accept that Starbucks serves up high-superiority brew which helps them influence during the daylight (Vogel, D., 2007). However coffee is different from being the single menu choice. Today stores carry a small collection of food products along with sufficient coffee free drinks making them friendlier to snacks seekers and children (Roberts 2003).

Consumers similarly have the choice to overuse (a trenta macchiato alongside donuts on the side), or under use (a lean latte with a vegan food box). If one meets a Starbucks’ customer, the client will refer you to Starbucks saying Starbucks is the only beautiful and secure place for all palates (Frei 2006)

 Atmosphere

At a charge around two dollars for a tall (small) coffee, also upwards of twenty dollars for the swankiest drinks possible, it is easier believing that there is more attention than merely decent coffee for the corporation to accomplish such a great victory at these not much competitive prices  (Roberts 2003). Along with its diversity from non-coffee drinks along with on the eat, the ambiance of Starbucks is a magnet. Currently, most consumers cute much identify what to anticipate when they enter the outside part of the building. Starbucks internal in Los Angeles will not appear too dissimilar from Starbuck in Tokyo; a ridiculous warm system, substitute music, biological looking-art, in addition to the barista in a green apron. The whole thing concerning the internal part of Starbucks, from the warm smell to the spontaneous screams, couches, and comforts

 Reliably Suitable

Maybe the dependability of the experience of Starbucks is fundamental to captivating over the loyalty and taste buds of customers. Barista quickly works beside keeps the long line moving. Starbucks has even amalgamated with Square to make upcoming of the checking procedure cashless.  People complain concerning the high prices of Starbucks, however, is $ 2.5 actually which disgraceful for a good joe cup, free WIFI, along with a public setting in which to mingle, work and sit.  Bottommost line, when one walks into a Starbucks, one knows what he was getting himself into, also as the figures remain to confirm, confidence is quite gorgeous.

As our current lives seemed unceasing to upsurge in step and lessen in free-time, the model of Starbucks became even more applicable. Starbucks has a collection of competitors, some new some old, who similarly conceit themselves on providing expensive coffee with rapidity. A few distinguished competitors comprise Tim Hortons, Dunkin Donuts, Peet’s Coffee, also, the Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf (leading confidentially possessed coffee shop in the United States). These well-known corporations show capacity for additional development, however, as of today, the competitors of Starbucks are either more locally-based or merely fail to inhabit the sphere as slowly. Since Starbucks still upholds its advert as World’s biggest coffee chain, with nearly 17,000 supplies as well as including in over fifty nations, the current souk dissatisfaction is not disastrous rather is unsatisfactory.

Rather than attempting to power onto the marketplace, the similar products that worked in the United States, like regular coffee, Starbucks established tastes such as green tea seasoned coffee beverage, which appeals to the local taste. Instead of pushing readymade orders that justify for the mainstream American vendors, Starbucks changed to native client needs as well as encouraged dine-in services.

By providing contended settings on a bazaar where few cafeterias had air acclimatizing in 1990, Starbucks became a defacto place of meeting for managers and gathering of comrades. This means that Starbucks reformed its model of business, particularly for Chinese, instead of inflexible attempting to relocate the whole thing that operated in China and America, so that several products such as Home Depot and Best Buy (Kuczmarski 1996).  The challenges with pushing dine-services in great contended instead of taking out are that income for every square meter is Lee than in the United States. The ordinary revenue for every opening in China is 1/3 of 2/3s that in the United States (Baker 2007).

To neutralize this, Starbucks located itself as a purchase. The standard coffee drinks sold in China is classier than in the United States. Carrying a mug is observed as a standing sign, a means of demonstrating complexity, in a little individual extravagance for the medium class in Chinese (Kuczmarski 1996). The high pricing approach of Chinese of specialty beverages allows Starbucks to have its outlets in China to be more lucrative per supplies in China in spite of lower capacity. Generally, in Asia, the operating margin of Starbucks are 35% in 2001 against 22% in the United States. Excessive products push for marketplace share by reducing its prices however in realism they should be pointing for limits.

No single premium pricing approach of Starbucks fits market demand however it as well allows the Starbucks to frequently squash higher boundary specialty brands like skill sets that counterbalance rising product cost. As urbanization rates of China near fifty-two percent, corporations’ necessity to put into place policies to handle the increasing product cost (Mitchell and Coles 2003).

Starbucks has similarly done astounding work at training, retaining, recruiting staffs. Thirty percent yearly income is typical in China according to compiled data by the company. However, Starbucks has far worst income than the average of the company by little recompense package, work settings, as well as vocation pathways. A barista who has worked at Starbucks for four centuries said that he was feeling being take care of by company management, and he enjoyed the occupation and expected to stay lengthier at the enterprise (Mitchell and Coles 2003).

The services of the Starbucks are on equality if not greater than the five-star hotel. In client interview with many thousand customers in Shanghai, the familiar told the firm that they liked the palate of brands from rivals, however, continued going to the Starbucks since it has quality services. Far as well, several MNCs treat their Chinese workers as 2nd class inhabitants with little development of career (Hamel and Valikangas 2003). Their senior administration positions are awash with outsiders, Hong Kongers or Taiwanese without any inland Chinese illustration. Starbucks comprehended that the worth suggestion it was providing Chinese was dissimilar than in the in the United States (Mitchell and Coles 2003). They were capable of adapting their model of business to fit China while maintaining their essential values

Primary consumers’ age group such as Gender and why

Starbucks holds nearly thirty-three percent of the marketplace share for coffee in the United States (Chris Paxson 2009). It vends almost as much like coffee as do fast nutrition as well as suitable supplies pooled, although its bulk its consumers are in the metropolis or fashionable capacities.  Starbucks has been capable of gaining such a substantial market share by specifically catering to a distinct target spectators (De Pelsmacker, Driesen, and Rayp 2005).

Adults

The primary objective of the Starbucks is women and men aged twenty-five and forty years. They explain for nearly half (50%) of its entre trade. The appeal of Starbucks to this client peer group thru hip, new designs which are consistent with its décor and advertising, as well as functioning to keep its brands present status signs. Clients have the habit of being cosmopolitans with comparatively high revenue, specialized vocations along with social wellbeing. This objective onlookers yearly grows at the rate of three percent (De Pelsmacker, Driesen, and Rayp 2005).

Young Adults

Young grownups, aged eighteen to twenty-four, total forty percent of sales of Starbucks. Starbucks locates itself as a dwelling college student can study hang out, write the term paper as well as meet friends (Patterson 2007). The appeals of Starbucks to this consumer directly thru launching know-how immediately accessible, concentrating on community interacting along with aggressively humanizing crisp images. The young grownup onlookers grow at the rate of 4.6% every year (Patterson 2007).

Teens and Kids

Teens and children are similarly a huge part of the target audience of Starbucks. Self-possessed, consumers’ age 13-18 is part of two percent of sales of Starbucks; however, most products for children are bought by a parent. Whether the emphasis was on the steamed milk which baristas of Starbucks refer as sugary, babyccinos, caffeinated  (Jervis, Lopetcharat, and Drake 2012), thrashed cream topped coffee beverages which are so prevalent with teens, kids and teenagers forming a significant part of the business of Starbucks (d’Astous and Legendre 2009). Children go to Starbucks with the parents, both child and mother leave with the mug in hands. Meanwhile, teens use Starbucks as a hanging out place with families or to education. Starbucks might not directly cater to children (as well as risk disapproval concerning the high caffeine and calories contents of some the Starbucks’ beverages). However the corporation does not make its brands child-kids (as well as criticism about the high caffeine besides calorie contents of various drinks) nonetheless, it does make its brands kid-welcoming distinctive kid dimensions for example (McNeal and Yeh, 2003).

Complimentary Products

Specialty coffee beverages accounted for nearly seventy-five percent sales of Starbucks; however, a cumulative quantity of its trade is positioned on vending whole bean coffee along with produce (McNeal and Yeh, 2003). Starbucks has made its coffee accessible for direct online orders  (d’Astous and Legendre 2009), in supermarket additionally offer hand-picked food service openings the opportunity to carry the coffee family of Starbucks such as Starbucks VIA (Yuan and Wu 2008), Seattle’s Best and Starbucks product. These brands give clients opportunity to have the experience of Starbucks at home-based, as well as, it is a place that Starbucks is insistent

(Noel 2009).

Why Starbucks is a high level place to relax and organize events

 

The Business Case for Social Responsibility

Starbucks described CSR as conducting the trade in a way that produce economic, environmental (Perrons 2004), and social welfares to the societies in which the business operates (Weick, Sutcliffe and Obstfeld 2008). Eventually, it implies being answerable to the company shareholders. There is an increasing acknowledgement of the necessity for corporate responsibility. Clients demand more a brand from their preferred products. Workers choose to work for corporations with sturdy values.  Stakeholders are more motivated to invest in business with exceptional company reputation. Quite merely being communally answerable is not only the correct thing to do; it can differentiate a business from its company earls (Altschuler, Somkin, and Adler2004). Since there is affirmative profits for being a socially responsible corporation. Starbucks trusts it is logical to observe the actions in terms of savings. By capitalizing in maintainable trade practices along with origin states that provide coffees to Starbucks, the company encourages sustained high-superiority supply. In other societies where Starbucks does the business, it invests in local organization to enhance the life quality. Additionally by investing in the partners, the company has an advantage of enticing as well as maintaining capable (Altschuler, Somkin, and Adler2004), industrious workers, and that aids decreasing the company’s cost of training, hiring and income costs. Finally, there is no battle between doing well and doing good (Weick, Sutcliffe and Obstfeld 2008). At Starbucks, there is a belief of doing well and good go together.

Sustainability Is Indispensable To the Company Success

Coffee is only second to water as most common beverage in the World, with more than four billion mugs yearly consumed. Coffee is a massive business employing twenty million persons internationally, besides positioned as the 2^nd most sold product in the world after petrol. Starbucks buys coffee at percentages over the product marketplace prices in the World, that is the international reference coffee traders’ use for product-grade coffees) (Kotler and Lee 2008). The dividends they pat differ by coffee type, besides general superiority of the specific coffee, comparative to the eminence of New York C’ product-grade. Throughout the past years, an international coffee surplus has drastically decreased prices at the wholesale  (Perrons 2004). At the closure of financial 2001, the paid prices for coffee on the NYC dipped to $ .49 per lb a level which has never been experienced for the last thirty years during the past year, a worldwide surplus of coffee has dramatically reduced wholesale prices. At the end of fiscal 2001, prices paid for coffee on the “New York C” had dip to $0.48/lb—a level not seen in nearly 30 years.

The drop of prices affected growers, specifically the small-scale farmers which nearly produced ¾ coffee supply in the world. Starbucks buys coffees from majority of these small scale farmers, multi-generation farms, disbursing best prices which allow farmers to provide for their children additionally preserve their farmhouses. As Starbucks trade enlarges, so do the needs of the farmers grow. While Starbucks buys about 1% of the international coffee supply (Kotler and Lee 2008), the acquisitions of the company is only the uppermost eminence arabica coffee bean internationally grown (Kotler and Lee 2008).  Because of Starbucks remarkably high principles for excellence coffees, one of the company’s most significant needs is securing long-lasting supply of unroasted green coffees from the farmers the company knows and trusts. The maintainability if the farmhouses is fundamentally connected to the success of the company. Starbucks identifies the significance of assisting farmers to make sure that farmers have a supportable source of revenue. To solve this issue, the company has shifted from New York C-based method pricing, centering on numerous approaches such as safeguarding more conventions based on downright, discussed prices, discussing more long lasting contracts, increasing the quantity of purchased coffee directly from cooperatives and farms, helping coffee growers to gain access to reasonable credit. Moreover, introducing innovative coffee obtaining guideline which rewards agriculturalists for using maintainable growing practice, providing fiscal supports for educational and health projects which directly gain growers alongside their societies, and finally, increasing the company’s supportable coffee categories, obligation to origins, comprising Shade Grown Mexico besides Fair Trade Certified Coffee(Kotler and Lee 2008). All these benefits explain why people think that Starbucks is the best place to relax and organize events.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Alon, I. and Bian, K., 2005. Real estate franchising: The case of Coldwell Banker expansion into China. Business Horizons, 48(3), pp.223-231.

Alon, I., 2006. Executive insight: evaluating the market size for service franchising in emerging markets. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 1(1), pp.9-20.

Altschuler, A., Somkin, C.P. and Adler, N.E., 2004. Local services and amenities, neighborhood social capital, and health. Social science & medicine, 59(6), pp.1219-1229.

Baker, B., 2007. Destination branding for small cities: The essentials for successful place branding. Destination Branding Book. Thompson, C.J. and Arsel, Z., 2004. The Starbucks brandscape and consumers'(anticorporate) experiences of glocalization. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), pp.631-642

Berry, L.L., 2000. Cultivating service brand equity. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), pp.128-137.

Chaudhry, P.E., Zimmerman, A., Peters, J.R. and Cordell, V.V., 2009. Preserving intellectual property rights: Managerial insight into the escalating counterfeit market quandary. Business Horizons, 52(1), pp.57-66.

Chris Paxson, M., 2009. Boomer boom for hospitality: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 18(1), pp.89-98.

d’Astous, A. and Legendre, A., 2009. Understanding consumers’ ethical justifications: A scale for appraising consumers’ reasons for not behaving ethically. Journal of business ethics, 87(2), pp.255-268.

De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L. and Rayp, G., 2005. Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair‐trade coffee. Journal of consumer affairs, 39(2), pp.363-385.

Frei, F.X., 2006. Breaking the trade-off between efficiency and service. Harvard business review, 84(11), p.92.

Hamel, G. and Valikangas, L., 2003. The quest for resilience. Harvard business review, 81(9), pp.52-65.

Han, G.K. and Zhang, A., 2009. Starbucks is forbidden in the Forbidden City: Blog, circuit of culture and informal public relations campaign in China. Public Relations Review, 35(4), pp.395-401.

Harrison, J.S., Chang, E.Y., Gauthier, C., Joerchel, T., Nevarez, J. and Wang, M., 2005. Exporting a North American concept to Asia Starbucks in China. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 46(2), pp.275-283.

Hwang, J., 2005. Coffee Goes to China: An Examination of Starbucks’ Market Entry Strategy. Journal of Undergraduate Research, 6(8), pp.1-9.

Jervis, S.M., Lopetcharat, K. And Drake, M.A., 2012. Application Of Ethnography And Conjoint Analysis To Determine Key Consumer Attributes For Latte‐Style Coffee Beverages. Journal Of Sensory Studies, 27(1), Pp.48-58.

Kotler, P. and Lee, N., 2008. Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. John Wiley & Sons.

Kuczmarski, T.D., 1996. What is innovation? The art of welcoming risk. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 13(5), pp.7-11.

McNeal, J.U. and Yeh, C.H., 2003. Consumer behavior of Chinese children: 1995-2002. Journal of consumer marketing, 20(6), pp.542-554.

Mitchell, D. and Coles, C., 2003. The ultimate competitive advantage of continuing business model innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5), pp.15-21.

Noe, R.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Gerhart, B. and Wright, P.M., 2006. Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage.

Noel, H., 2009. Basics marketing 01: Consumer behaviour (Vol. 1). AVA Publishing.

Patterson, P.G., 2007. Demographic correlates of loyalty in a service context. Journal of Services Marketing, 21(2), pp.112-121.

Perrons, D., 2004. Globalization and social change: People and places in a divided world. Psychology Press.

Plog, S.C., 2005. Starbucks: More than a cup of coffee. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 46(2), pp.284-287.

Porter, M.E., 2008. The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard business review, 86(1), pp.25-40.

Roberts, S., 2003. Supply chain specific? Understanding the patchy success of ethical sourcing initiatives. Journal of business ethics, 44(2), pp.159-170.

Venkatraman, M. and Nelson, T., 2008. From servicescape to consumptionscape: A photo-elicitation study of Starbucks in the New China. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), pp.1010-1026.

Vogel, D., 2007. The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Brookings Institution Press.

Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M. and Obstfeld, D., 2008. Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Crisis management, 3(1), pp.81-123.

Yuan, Y.H.E. and Wu, C.K., 2008. Relationships among experiential marketing, experiential value, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 32(3), pp.387-410.

Zakaria, F., Liu, M., Caryl, C., Miller, K.L., Punoose, R. and Barry, J., 2005. Does the future belong to China. Newsweek, May, 9, pp.26-45.